Insights

Home » Breach of Contract » ​Enforcing (or Challenging) Liquidated Damages Clauses in New York

​Enforcing (or Challenging) Liquidated Damages Clauses in New York

by | Breach of Contract, Insights

Liquidated damages clauses in contracts can provide businesses with greater certainty about the financial consequences of a breach. Rather than requiring a party to prove their losses after a breach occurs, a properly drafted liquidated damages clause establishes in advance the amount of damages that would be owed if a party fails to perform their obligations. However, it’s important to understand that New York law distinguishes between legitimate liquidated damages provisions and unenforceable penalties.

What is a Liquidated Damages Clause?

A liquidated damages clause is a contractual provision that establishes the damages a party must pay if they breach the agreement. These clauses can be particularly useful when a breach could cause financial harm that would be difficult to calculate precisely. But it’s essential to be aware that there are certain limitations to these provisions. New York law only allows liquidated damages clauses to be enforced if the amount is reasonable in light of the anticipated or actual harm.

When Will a New York Court Enforce a Liquidated Damages Clause?

When seeking to enforce a liquidated damages clause, a party must generally establish that the contractual requirements triggering the provision have been satisfied. Generally, New York courts enforce liquidated damages provisions when two conditions are met:

  1. The actual loss would have been difficult or impossible to determine precisely when the parties entered into the contract; and
  2. The amount specified bears a reasonable relationship to the probable loss.

To determine whether a liquidated damages clause is enforceable, a court would evaluate the circumstances that existed when the parties entered into the agreement, not simply the losses that occurred. A court would also consider whether the parties could reasonably have anticipated the potential harm at the time the contract was formed. Contracts negotiated between businesses, sophisticated parties, and those represented by counsel are typically much more likely to be upheld.

Notably, to be enforceable, the clause itself should provide a reasonable estimate of the anticipated loss, rather than an amount designed to punish the breaching party. Referring to “liquidated damages” in a contract does not make the clause automatically enforceable if the amount was actually meant to be punitive. If the court deems the provision is enforceable, the agreed-upon amount generally serves as the measure of damages to compensate the non-breaching party for their losses.

How Can a Business Challenge a Liquidated Damages Clause?

There are several arguments a party may make to challenge a liquidated damages clause in a contract. Some common legal grounds for disputing its enforceability can include:

  • Disproportionality: A court may decline to enforce a provision where the agreed amount is grossly disproportionate to the anticipated harm.
  • Ascertainable damages: A liquidated damages clause may be challenged in cases where the actual damages could have been calculated with reasonable precision when the parties entered into the agreement.
  • Prior material breach: If the party attempting to enforce the clause committed a material breach first, they typically cannot collect liquidated damages.
  • Penalty intent: If the court determines that a provision is an unenforceable penalty meant to punish the breaching party, the party seeking damages may be limited to proving their actual losses, rather than recovering the amount specified in the contract.
  • Unenforceability of the underlying provision: A court would review evidence of unequal bargaining power, fraud, duress, or unconscionability at the time of contract formation. If any of these circumstances were present when the contract was signed, a court may render the agreement unenforceable.

The burden generally falls on the party seeking to avoid the clause to demonstrate that the stipulated damages are disproportionate to the probable loss, or that the actual damages were readily ascertainable when the contract was formed. In addition, if the amount specified in the clause was arbitrary and had no mathematical link to the actual harm, the provision may be rendered unenforceable. Other provisions in the contract may also affect whether and how liquidated damages can be recovered, based on the language of the agreement.

Contact an Experienced New York Business Litigation Attorney

If you are involved in a contract dispute concerning liquidated damages, an experienced New York business litigation attorney can evaluate the provision in your agreement and help protect your interests. At Barnes & Barnes, P.C., we offer skilled counsel for a wide range of business disputes across Long Island, including those involving enforcing or challenging liquidated damages clauses. Contact us at (516) 673-0674 to schedule a consultation and learn how we can assist you.

SEND US A MESSAGE

VIEW BY CATEGORY

ADDITIONAL INSIGHTS

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to the Barnes & Barnes Newsletter, a valuable resource brimming with insights directly from commercial litigation partners, Leo K. Barnes, Jr. and Matthew J. Barnes.

Case Studies

Discover a few of the successes Barnes & Barnes has achieved for its clients between New York City and Montauk.